Blog | Subscribe | Free Trial | Contact Us | Cart | Donate | Planned Giving
Log In | Activate Digital Subscription | Search
facebook
rss
twitter
  • Current
    • FALL 2018
      • Fall 2018 PREVIEW
    • The Business of Family Planning
    • Blog
    • You Should Know
    • Hot Topics
    • A Pastor’s Reflections
    • About Us
      • Contributors
      • Free Articles
      • All Issues
    • In The News
    • FROM THE EDITOR
  • DINNER
    • GREAT DEFENDER OF LIFE DINNER 2018
    • HOST COMMITTEE Great Defender of Life Dinner 2018
    • SPONSOR TABLE Great Defender of Life 2018 Dinner Ticket
    • Great Defender of Life 2018 Dinner Ticket
    • DINNER JOURNAL ADVERTISING 2018
  • EXPECT
  • DOLS
    • Planned Giving: Wills, Trusts, and Gifts of Stock
  • Archive
    • Archive Spotlight
  • Shop
    • Cart

A Pastor's Reflections

0 Comment

The Vision of the Good

26 Jan 2018
W. Ross Blackburn
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

Then Pharaoh commanded all his people, “Every son that is born to the Hebrews you shall cast into the Nile, but you shall let every daughter live” (Exodus 1:22).

A nation does not have to feel hatred toward children in order to kill them. It is enough simply for them to interfere with people’s desires. For Pharaoh, the decree that all Israelite baby boys be killed was presumably a response to his fear that Israel would escape and deprive Egypt of the economic benefits of slavery (Exodus 1:10-11). For Herod in the time of Jesus, the decree to kill the Israelite boys was given to protect his throne, since he had heard a new king was to be born (Matthew 2:1-18). In Nazi Germany, abortion was forbidden for Aryan babies, but not for others, as Hitler pursued his goal of creating a “pure” race. China’s one-child-policy, with its practice of forced abortion, was the fruit of a commitment to reducing population growth. In each case, a certain vision of the good determined the fate of children.

Our own attachment to legal abortion in the United States is also rooted in a vision of the good—a commitment to sexual license apart from the responsibility that children always bring, undergirded by a notion of equality that insists all people be the same. This is neither inference nor exaggeration. As our Supreme Court declared explicitly in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992),

[t]he Roe rule’s limitation on state power could not be repudiated without serious inequity to people who, for two decades of economic and social developments, have organized intimate relationships and made choices that define their views of themselves and their places in society, in reliance on the availability of abortion in the event that contraception should fail.

The Court’s rationale is clear—to restrict abortion would be unfair to those who have become accustomed to sexual license. In other words, sexual license and children cannot both be protected. Children have a tendency to impinge upon the desires of sinful man.

One of the marks of the Christian community is a love for children that defines our own vision of the good. For the Christian, the good is not economic prosperity at the expense of others. Nor is the good a commitment to preserving our position at all costs. Nor is it a utopian vision of how the world should be (to be brought about by any means necessary and/or expedient). Nor is it rooted in the pursuit of pleasure without responsibility. Whatever else the good is, the Christian vision is built around a deep appreciation of children, with the corresponding commitment to bless and protect them. In effect, embracing children as a blessing transforms our vision of what is good.

The lesson Jesus taught his disciples must ever be learned by the church:

Then the children were brought to him that he might lay his hands on them and pray. The disciples rebuked the people, but Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven.” And he laid his hands on them and went away (Matthew 19:13-15).

The disciples apparently felt that Jesus had more important things to do than to be with the children. He didn’t. And neither does His church.

127 people have visited this page. 1 have visited this page today.
About the Author
W. Ross Blackburn

Dr. Ross Blackburn has been ordained for 20 years and has served as Rector for Christ the King for the past 10. He earned a Master of Divinity at Trinity School for Ministry, and a PhD in biblical studies at the University of Saint Andrews, Scotland. He and his wife Lauren have been married for 23 years and have five children.
As a member of Anglicans for Life's Board of Directors, Dr. Blackburn is a regular contributor to AFL's Lectionary Life App series, and writes for the Human Life Review as well as  Christian Publications

Social Share

  • google-share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Popular Articles

William E. May: An Appreciation

31 Comments

The Pro-Choice Abuse of Logic

21 Comments

Pro-Life Movement, Know Thyself

16 Comments

You Might Also Like

Get the Human Life Review

subscribe to HLR

Browse Our Past Issues

Pages

  • Issues
  • Human Life Foundation Blog
  • About Us
  • Hot Topics
  • Free Trial Issue
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Planned Giving
  • EXPECT
    • One Spring Night 2018

Follow Us On Twitter

Tweets by @HumanLifeReview

Find Us On Facebook

Human Life Review/Foundation

Search our Website

Contact Information

The Human Life Foundation, Inc.
The Human Life Review
271 Madison Avenue, Room 1005
New York, New York 10016
(212) 685-5210

Copyright (c) 2015 The Human Life Foundation: Web Design by Top Dawg Marketing